tokensfund.

Your lens on early-stage token launches

A column by Cameron Walton

News

Why Over 92% of New Crypto Tokens Fail to Sustain Their Launch Price

The median return for tokens launched since 2024 is a brutal -95.7%. That's the number that should stop every prospective IDO participant cold.

Cameron Walton, Tokenomics Veteran & Launchpad Critic·updated July 22, 2026

Why Over 92% of New Crypto Tokens Fail to Sustain Their Launch Price

According to fresh data from CryptoRank, a staggering 92.9% of crypto projects with market caps over $100 million are now underwater relative to their Token Generation Event price. Out of 113 such launches, only eight have managed to stay afloat. This isn't a market cycle correction; it's a wholesale slaughter of initial valuations, and it rewrites the basic risk calculus for anyone participating in a launchpad sale.

The Math of Massacre

Follow the money from the TGE. The data, cited by both KuCoin News and Phemex, examines tokens launched between 2024 and 2026. The conclusion is brutally simple: the default outcome for a new, capitalized project is to destroy value for initial buyers. The high fully diluted valuations (FDVs) we've criticized for years are finally doing what math predicted—they're collapsing under the weight of vesting cliffs and controlled circulating supplies. When a token launches with a $500 million FDV but only 5% of its supply circulating, every subsequent unlock is a guaranteed sell event. This data proves the market is now ruthlessly pricing in that future dilution, often from day one.

The Anomalies: What the 7.1% Know

Looking at the winners is more instructive than mourning the losers. Hyperliquid (HYPE) leads the pack with a 1,519% gain, followed by Ondo Finance (ONDO) at 101.4%. The common thread isn't luck; it's demonstrable product-market fit and ecosystem traction. These aren't speculative promises; they are functional protocols with real user adoption. Capital has concentrated here because it's seeking refuge from the tokenomics dumpster fire elsewhere. The lesson is clear: investors are finally demanding proof of utility before they hold through unlock schedules. For launchpads, this means projects without a live, used product will struggle to attract serious capital, no matter how slick the pitch deck.

The Launchpad Reality Check

This report should be pinned above every launchpad's portal. The era of flipping a TGE allocation for easy gains is statistically over for the overwhelming majority. For users of platforms like BONK's new Circus on Robinhood, the scrutiny must be relentless. The focus must shift from "Will it list?" to "What is the unlock schedule?" and "What's the realistic circulating market cap in 6 months?" Projects like SwarmBase, raising $7 million ahead of their TGE, will now face this exact gauntlet. Their incoming capital is earmarked for building an agentic AI infrastructure—a hot narrative—but that won't save them from the -95.7% median return if their tokenomics are designed for VC dumps. Savvy traders, meanwhile, are increasingly exploring automated copy trading strategies to navigate this volatility, finding refuge in mirroring the few who consistently pick winners. The path of least resistance now is to assume a new launch will fail to hold its price, and to demand overwhelming evidence to believe otherwise.